Thursday, October 30, 2008

HW 27

Noah Senzel

10/27/08

Period F

HW 27

A. 1. Czechoslovakia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Yugoslavia

2. a) Italy, Poland, Yugoslavia

b) Poland

3. a) Bulgaria, Russia, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Greece

b) Austria-Hungary

B. 1. To prevent free trade.

2. a) Britain got Iraq, Transjordan, and Palestine. France got Syria and Lebanon. (mandate system)

b) They wanted to control the trade with them.

HW 26

Noah Senzel

10/23/08

Period F

HW 26

A. 1. a) Lorraine, Alsace, Eupen, Malmedy, Upper Silesia, Hultschin, Posen, West Prussia, and North Schleswig.

b) Poland “cut into” Germany.

c) They wanted to make it so Germany could not fight again.

B. 1. a) The League of Nations, the open port to sea (Poland).

b)Demilitarization in Germany, reduction in armed forces for Germany, War Guilt Clause, repayments, land under control of League of Nations.

2. The giving of the German fleet to the British (they sunk the fleet instead).

C. A large amount of people were invited to make sure Germany had no choice but to sign.

HW 25

Noah Senzel

10/22/08

Period F

HW 25

A. Cleamenceau wanted a harsher peace treaty for the Germans because the French suffered the worst during the war. He didn't want them to ever be able to fight again. The war was more personal for them.


B. Cleamenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson were able to control the peace talks because they were the leaders of the most powerful countries on the winning side.


C. 1. Spearing a baby, human shields, occupation of civilian homes, laying waste to a city with fire, coming in for business.


2. a.) That they were war mongols whose only thought was war.

b) The Germans had just laid waste to their cities and men, killing civilians and soldiers alike.

c) Now, people disagree with it because they can better understand the German's motive and what actually happened through history. Also, it was different in historical context: now it's unacceptable.


3. The poster was trying to presaude British to not allow Germans to work in Great Britain, or trade with them. (An Economic/Social effect of WWI)


Heading: 2

Content: 6

Basics: 2

10/10!

Source A Page 41-42 Comp.

10/1/08

Noah Senzel

In-Class HW

-3marks 1) breifly discuss three things you can learn about life on the western front during WWI

-2 marks 2)breifly discuss two things you can't learn about life on the western front during WWI

1) One thing you can learn about life on the Western front during WWI from Source A is that many, many British men were mowed down by machine gun fire in an attempt to cross “no-mans land” and defeat the enemy. The source says, “The first line appeared with no end from left to right. It was quickly followed by second, then a third and a fourth...” Another thing you can learn is the men were hurrying: “the machine guns were pulled out of dugouts and hurriedly placed in position.” Third, they had to be always ready.

2) One thing you can't learn is how their life is not battling. Another is you don't know the British perspective.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

HW 24

Noah Senzel

10/22/08

Period F

HW 24

A. Allies:

France: 1,400,000

Belgium: 50,000

Britain: 750,000

Italy: 600,000

Russia: 1,700,000

US: 116,000

Central Powers:

Germans: 2,000,000

Austria-Hungary: 1,200,000

Bulgaria:100,000

Turkey: 325,000

B. France: Towns burned, civilians forced to work or killed, 2nd most men lost

C.1. Nice clothes, fancy (polished)shoes, hats, coats

2. Not much good food to go around

D. Treaty: an agreement between two powers, whether equal or unequal

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

HW 20

Noah Senzel
10/14/08
Period F
HW 20
Three things you can learn:
1. Japan was on the Allied side.
2. Britain and France were sneaky.
3. Arabs were getting a different deal than they were told.
Three things you can't learn:
1. What the Arabs are doing.
2. What the other Allies are doing.
3. What the Central Powers were doing.
4. What the French response was.
5. Not much use without the map. 

HW 21

Noah Senzel
10/14/08
Period F
HW 21
1. The Germans were forced to fight wars on both fronts once the Schlieffen plan failed. The Schlieffen Plan was the lifeblood of the German's tactics, and they had nothing to go by when it failed.
2. The entry of the USA into the war. When the USA entered the war, they brought a vast amount of new resources with them. With more supplies, the Allies were able to hold out and beat the Central Powers.
3. The continuous strain of losses by the Germans. The Germans lost all their experienced soldiers and were left with new, inexperienced recruits. The Allies also had the best soldiers from the US.


Monday, October 6, 2008

OPVL on "A Report on Mesopotamia"

Noah Senzel

10/06/08

Period F

HW 19

Origin: Written by Ex.-Lieut.-Col. T. E. Lawrence. Published in the Sunday Times on the 22nd of August, 1920. Retrieved from <http://www.gwpda.org/1918p/mesopo.html> on 10/5/08, site updated on 08/15/08.


Purpose: To provide an opinion on the policy of the British government towards their Middle-Eastern Allies, and to attempt to convince the government to change their policy.


Value: This document shows the opinion of one man, who had experience with the subject at hand (served with the Arabs and the British and saw both sides' reactions), on the treatment of the Arabs by the British (unkept promises, occupying cities, etc.).

It also shows his idea of who is to blame (the government) , why they are to blame (they send drafts without reinforcing them), and how they are worse compared to the Turks who held the Arabs previously (more civilians killed, more military equipment, more occupying men, etc.).


Limitations: Only the opinion of one man, which was altered by the newspaper editor, in 1920, in Britain, who was loyal to both Britain and the Arabs. He comments on why the government is failing although he has no government experience.  

Thursday, October 2, 2008

HW11

Noah Senzel
10/2/08
Period F
HW 11
1. What is Stoessinger's thesis? 

His thesis is that if you started a war, you can stop it. No country is incapable of recovering from mistakes. 

2. What did the Kaiser do wrong that caused the war?

He assumed that Austria's leaders wouldn't turn to war. He also assummed that in the rare case that they did, Russia would support them in order to keep their pride, rather than support Serbia.

3. Why did Austria feel the need to go to war with Serbia, according to Stoessinger?

According to Stoessinger, Austria felt the need to go to war with Serbia because if it did not, than Serbia would destroy the Austrian monarchy. This final insult would turn the duel monarchy into "a worm-eaten museum piece," according to Saravejo.

4.What are a couple examples of poor leadership that may have led to war, according to Stoessinger?

One example of poor leadership was the Kaiser and his "blank cheque" to Austria. 
Another was his decision to strike first. 

10/1/08 In-Class HW

10/1/08

Noah Senzel

In-Class HW

-3marks 1) breifly discuss three things you can learn about life on the western front during WWI

-2 marks 2)breifly discuss two things you can't learn about life on the western front during WWI


1) One thing you can learn about life on the Western front during WWI from Source A is that many, many British men were mowed down by machine gun fire in an attempt to cross “no-mans land” and defeat the enemy. The source says, “The first line appeared with no end from left to right. It was quickly followed by second, then a third and a fourth...” Another thing you can learn is the men were hurrying: “the machine guns were pulled out of dugouts and hurriedly placed in position.” Third, they had to be always ready.

2) One thing you can't learn is how their life is not battling. Another is you don't know the British perspective.

HW14

Noah Senzel

9/24/08

Period F

HW 14

1.a. Germany was the first to use submarines for direct warfare, other countries used them to protect harbors or not at all.

b. Britain readied certain passenger ships, such as the Lusitania, to become battle cruisers and would pay the captains for the upgrades; they simultaneously loaded some ships with contraband (war supplies), and the Lusitania was designed to hold these.

2. The Germans saw the Lusitania as a battle cruiser, and therefore thought it was ok to sink it. They saw the passengers as people who ignored their printed warning as chose their own fate.

3. The Americans saw the sinking of the Lusitania as a killing of innocents—the Lusitania was a passenger ship, and the Germans had no right to sink it. They saw the giving of the medals to the Germans responsible as showing their inhumane, demonic side.


HW18

Noah Senzel

10/1/08

Period F

HW18


The Germans' plan was to mobilize, and mobilize quickly, as dictated by the Schlieffen Plan. They wanted to destroy them quickly in order to move on to France. They did this by taking the French supplies and using them for themselves. They also sunk ships carrying weapons to prevent the French and the British from using them.